Court reports
Structured expert reports for civil, social and administrative proceedings, including causation analysis, interpretation of genetic findings and prognosis.
Service lines
Clear allocation by instruction type
The service structure is aligned with typical instructing parties and decision questions. This makes scope, workflow and expected output transparent before formal instruction.
Insurer reports
Independent assessment of genetically determined disease in disability, benefits review and medical risk settings.
Variant assessment
Focused review of complex variants, current-standard classification, clinical relevance and genotype-phenotype correlation in rare disease.
Supplemental and second opinions
Clearly delimited follow-up opinions on existing reports, disputed findings or narrowly defined scientific questions.
| Instruction type | Typical focus |
|---|---|
| Courts | Judicial question, causation, function and prognosis |
| Insurers | Benefit relevance, plausibility and functional limitation |
| Law firms | Case strategy support, record review and specialist clarification |
| Clinics and institutions | Variant interpretation, specialist advisory opinions and second review |
Concrete instruction
Preliminary alignment of question and record requirements
The most efficient first step is a short message stating the instructing party, the question to be answered, approximate record volume and the desired timeline.
Independence
Independent, evidence-based and free of party influence
All expert reports are prepared independently, without influence from involved parties, and based solely on the medical file, the documented genetic findings and current scientific standards.